Calculator

Consulting Engagement Cost Calculator

Multiplies team size, day rate, weekly days and duration into the full run-rate of a consulting engagement, so the spend is visible before the signature.

Enter the number of consultants, the average day rate, the days each consultant works per week and the length of the engagement in weeks. The arithmetic is fixed (the same four inputs always produce the same total) and your figures never leave the browser.

Last reviewed 3 July 2026 · Free and ungated

Review this before committing

Before the engagement letter is signed, put the proposal to selected senior operators who have both bought and sold this kind of work. A complimentary first report brings that challenge in confidentially.

Review this before committing

How a client brief works · What you receive

Fixed formula · no AI · nothing stored

Run the numbers

Engagement cost = consultants × day rate × days per week × weeks. How our tools work

The arithmetic behind the quote

Consulting proposals are usually priced by phase or by outcome, which keeps attention away from the simplest question in professional services: how many people, at what rate, for how long. Multiplying consultants by day rate by days per week by weeks reconstructs the run-rate the pricing was built from. Firms are not hiding this arithmetic maliciously. But a weekly burn figure invites a scrutiny that a phase price does not, which is why you should do the reconstruction yourself before the negotiation, not after it.

A twelve-week example

A proposed team of five (say two directors at €3,200 a day and three analysts at €1,200, an average of €2,000) works four days a week on site for a twelve-week diagnostic. The engagement cost is 5 × €2,000 × 4 × 12 = €480,000. Notice what the blended average conceals: the directors account for €6,400 of each day's €10,000, and if their attendance quietly falls to two days a week from month two, you are paying an analyst-heavy team at a director-weighted price.

Costs the run-rate does not show

The multiplication captures the fee. The engagement will cost more than the fee.

  • Your own organisation's time. Workshops, data requests, interview schedules and steering preparation routinely absorb the equivalent of two or three internal full-time people, and no invoice ever arrives for them.
  • Extension probability. Many engagements are structured so that the diagnostic ends by recommending an implementation phase. Price the arc you are likely to buy, not the phase in front of you.
  • Expenses clauses. Travel, accommodation and "administrative charges" at a percentage of fees can add a meaningful margin on top of the run-rate, so read the clause before comparing proposals.
  • Team composition drift. The seniority mix that was pitched is a staffing intention, not a contractual fact, unless the contract names the individuals and prices their substitution.

Boundaries of the estimate

The calculator assumes a stable team, a stable rate and full chargeable weeks, none of which survives contact with a real engagement calendar. It also says nothing about whether the work is worth buying at any price. Its job is narrower: to convert a phase-priced proposal back into a weekly burn that a budget holder can compare with alternatives, including doing less of the work internally.

Frequently asked questions

The proposal already gives a fixed fee. Why rebuild the number?

Because the fixed fee was built from exactly these inputs, and rebuilding it tells you the assumed team shape and margin. If your reconstruction lands far below the quoted fee, you have found either a heavy contingency or a heavy margin, and both are negotiable.

Which day rate should I enter?

The blended rate implied by the actual staffing plan (total planned fees divided by total planned person-days) rather than the rate card. Rate cards anchor high so the discount can look generous; the staffing plan is where the real price lives.

How do I reflect the risk of an extension?

Run the calculation twice: once at the proposed weeks, and once at the duration comparable engagements actually ran in your organisation. Presenting both figures to the sponsor turns "it might extend" from a vague worry into a priced scenario.

The run-rate is now visible. Test the proposal behind it.

Review this before committing